The Robot Report

  • Home
  • News
  • Technologies
    • Batteries / Power Supplies
    • Cameras / Imaging / Vision
    • Controllers
    • End Effectors
    • Microprocessors / SoCs
    • Motion Control
    • Sensors
    • Soft Robotics
    • Software / Simulation
  • Development
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Human Robot Interaction / Haptics
    • Mobility / Navigation
    • Research
  • Robots
    • AGVs
    • AMRs
    • Consumer
    • Collaborative Robots
    • Drones
    • Humanoids
    • Industrial
    • Self-Driving Vehicles
    • Unmanned Maritime Systems
  • Business
    • Financial
      • Investments
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Earnings
    • Markets
      • Agriculture
      • Healthcare
      • Logistics
      • Manufacturing
      • Mining
      • Security
    • RBR50
      • RBR50 Winners 2025
      • RBR50 Winners 2024
      • RBR50 Winners 2023
      • RBR50 Winners 2022
      • RBR50 Winners 2021
  • Resources
    • Automated Warehouse Research Reports
    • Digital Issues
    • eBooks
    • Publications
      • Automated Warehouse
      • Collaborative Robotics Trends
    • Search Robotics Database
    • Videos
    • Webinars / Digital Events
  • Events
    • RoboBusiness
    • Robotics Summit & Expo
    • DeviceTalks
    • R&D 100
    • Robotics Weeks
  • Podcast
    • Episodes
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Cruise, Waymo lead way in Calif. autonomous vehicle testing

By Steve Crowe | February 10, 2021

waymo

Waymo’s self-driving minivan. | Credit: Waymo

California’s Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) yesterday released its annual Disengagement Report, which breaks down the number of times a human driver takes over control of an autonomous driving system being tested on the state’s public roads. The DMV released reports for 29 companies for the period from December 2019 to November 2020.

Waymo (29,944.69) and Cruise (28,520.34) are the leaders in the clubhouse when it comes to the number of miles driven between disengagements. China’s AutoX (20,367) is a distant third. This is the sixth straight year in which Waymo increased its number of miles driven between disengagements.

Cruise, which is owned by General Motors, drove more than 770,000 miles last year to overtake Waymo, which has historically owned the top spot. Waymo drove just under 629,000 miles in 2020 after logging more than 1.4 million miles in California in 2019. Both companies drove more miles in 2019, but many self-driving car operations were shut down during part of 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Zoox, which was acquired by Amazon in 2020 for $1.2 billion, drove 102,521 miles and had a disengagement every 1,627.32 miles. Aurora, which acquired Uber ATG in December 2020, drove just 12,208 miles in California and had a disengagement every 329.93 miles.

The chart below compiles data from each company’s performance in 2020 and their respective miles per disengagement in 2019. It is ordered highest to lowest based on the number of miles driven between disengagements in 2020. We have more information about the 2019 data here.

2020 Calif. Self-Driving Car Disengagements

Company2020 Miles Driven2020 Disengagements2020 Miles/Disengagement2019 Miles/Disengagement
Waymo628,8392129,944.6913219.43
Cruise770,0492728,520.3412221.17
AutoX40,734220,367.0010684.67
Pony.ai225,4962110,737.906475.75
Argo AI21,037210,518.59N/A
WeRide13,01426,507.00151.72
DiDi10,40125,200.75N/A
Nuro55,37011 5,033.622022.41
DeepRoute10,01833,339.33N/A
Zoox102,521631,627.321595.6
QCraft7,58216473.88N/A
Aurora12,20837329.9395.24
Lyft32,731123266.1125.75
Gatik2,35211213.82N/A
Apple18,805130 144.66117.88
Nissan395498.6348.46
BMW122340.672.67
Aimotive2,98711326.43232.92
Mercedes29,9841,16725.696.93
NVIDIA3,03312524.2611.02
Qualcomm1,7279019.1958.49
SF Motors8756114.3424.95
Atlas47104.74N/A
EasyMile4241283.31N/A
Toyota2,8751,2152.370.62
Telenav4227.33
Udelv66491.351.59
Ridecell1481890.78N/A
Valeo49990.491.08

Argo AI, Atlas Robotics, DeepRoute, and QCraft reported numbers for a full year for the first time. Interestingly, 34 companies licensed to test self-driving cars on California’s public roads reported no testing took place. Tesla is one of those companies. Under California’s rules, there is no need to report data on systems below SAE Level 3. Tesla’s “Full Self-Driving” system is considered a SAE Level 2 driver assist system and not autonomous driving.

Seven companies (Bosch, Changan, Faraday Future, SAIC, Samsung, Torc Robotics, TuSimple) didn’t even renew their license. The license for Kaizr was suspended as of Feb. 9, 2021 as the company failed to submit a disengagement report despite conducting on-road testing.

Most autonomous vehicle companies, including Cruise and Waymo, have said disengagement reports are misleading for a variety of reasons. One major reason is the numbers are self-reported, so accuracy is always a question. But without a standard way to evaluate a self-driving car’s performance, this is the best information available. And for the first time, the California DMV shared who initiated the disengagement – the safety driver or the system – and where the disengagement occurred.

“For all of 2020, we averaged only one reportable disengagement per 28,520 miles,” Cruise wrote in a blog on Tuesday. “For the second half of 2020, we improved to more than 60,000 miles between reportable disengagement. And in the final three months of the year, we had zero reportable disengagements, a 10x improvement over the same period a year before.”

Waymo wrote on Twitter that while it appreciates what the DMV is trying to do with the report, “the metrics provide limited value in assessing the capabilities of the Waymo Driver, or in distinguishing its performance from other A/V companies.

“Further, our testing program spans different vehicles, software platforms, testing environments and objectives, so the disengagement rate in any given year simply can’t be predictive of real world performance.”

AutoX, which recently launched a robotaxi service for the public in China, drove only 40,734 miles. It experienced a disengagement every 20,637 miles, which is nearly double its performance last year.

About The Author

Steve Crowe

Steve Crowe is Executive Editor, Robotics, WTWH Media, and chair of the Robotics Summit & Expo and RoboBusiness. He is also co-host of The Robot Report Podcast, the top-rated podcast for the robotics industry. He joined WTWH Media in January 2018 after spending four-plus years as Managing Editor of Robotics Trends Media. He can be reached at scrowe@wtwhmedia.com

Tell Us What You Think! Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles Read More >

The 2025 RBR50 Robotics Innovation Awards, logo shown here, recognize several categories.
Top 50 robotics innovations special report
GAM is a leading provider of gearboxes.
Learn how gearboxes enable next-gen warehouse automation
ABB YuMi two-armed robot assisting with manufacturing.
ABI Research finds 53% of manufacturers are adopting robots for quality improvement
Kawasaki had one of the largest robots at Automate 2025.
10 robotics trends spotted at Automate 2025

RBR50 Innovation Awards

“rr
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for Robotics Professionals.
The Robot Report Listing Database

Latest Episode of The Robot Report Podcast

Automated Warehouse Research Reports

Sponsored Content

  • Sager Electronics and its partners, logos shown here, will exhibit at the 2025 Robotics Summit & Expo. Sager Electronics to exhibit at the Robotics Summit & Expo
  • The Shift in Robotics: How Visual Perception is Separating Winners from the Pack
  • An AutoStore automated storage and retrieval grid. Webinar to provide automated storage and retrieval adoption advice
  • Smaller, tougher devices for evolving demands
  • Modular motors and gearboxes make product development simple
The Robot Report
  • Automated Warehouse
  • RoboBusiness Event
  • Robotics Summit & Expo
  • About The Robot Report
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search The Robot Report

  • Home
  • News
  • Technologies
    • Batteries / Power Supplies
    • Cameras / Imaging / Vision
    • Controllers
    • End Effectors
    • Microprocessors / SoCs
    • Motion Control
    • Sensors
    • Soft Robotics
    • Software / Simulation
  • Development
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Human Robot Interaction / Haptics
    • Mobility / Navigation
    • Research
  • Robots
    • AGVs
    • AMRs
    • Consumer
    • Collaborative Robots
    • Drones
    • Humanoids
    • Industrial
    • Self-Driving Vehicles
    • Unmanned Maritime Systems
  • Business
    • Financial
      • Investments
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Earnings
    • Markets
      • Agriculture
      • Healthcare
      • Logistics
      • Manufacturing
      • Mining
      • Security
    • RBR50
      • RBR50 Winners 2025
      • RBR50 Winners 2024
      • RBR50 Winners 2023
      • RBR50 Winners 2022
      • RBR50 Winners 2021
  • Resources
    • Automated Warehouse Research Reports
    • Digital Issues
    • eBooks
    • Publications
      • Automated Warehouse
      • Collaborative Robotics Trends
    • Search Robotics Database
    • Videos
    • Webinars / Digital Events
  • Events
    • RoboBusiness
    • Robotics Summit & Expo
    • DeviceTalks
    • R&D 100
    • Robotics Weeks
  • Podcast
    • Episodes
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe