The Robot Report

  • Research
  • Technologies
    • Batteries / Power Supplies
    • Cameras / Imaging / Vision
    • Controllers
    • Grippers / End Effectors
    • Microprocessors / SoCs
    • Motion Control
    • Sensors / Sensing Systems
    • Soft Robotics
    • Software / Simulation
  • Development
    • A.I. / Cognition
    • Human Robot Interaction / Haptics
    • Mobility / Navigation
  • Robots
    • AGVs
    • AMRs
    • Consumer
    • Collaborative Robots
    • Drones
    • Exoskeletons
    • Self-Driving Vehicles
    • Unmanned Maritime Systems
  • Markets
    • Agriculture
    • Defense / Security
    • Healthcare
    • Logistics
    • Manufacturing
    • Mining
  • Investments
  • Resources
    • COVID-19
    • Digital Issues
    • Publications
      • Collaborative Robotics Trends
      • Robotics Business Review
    • RBR50
    • Search Robotics Database
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • RoboBusiness Direct
    • Robotics Summit & Expo
    • Healthcare Robotics Engineering Forum
    • DeviceTalks
    • R&D 100
  • Podcast

The Obvious isn’t always…

By Steve Meyer | May 27, 2016

Engineering of complex systems can sometimes be represented as a series of simplified approximations based on the performance of known subsystems.  In the case of wind turbines, there are 4 subsystems, aerodynamic, gearing, generator and power conversion.  In order to simplify the evaluation process of competing technologies in each category, they can be assigned an efficiency value and the system efficiency calculation is the product of values multiplied together.  This turns out to be a fairly obvious and easy way to assess the technology tradeoffs in the wind turbine industry.

The system design decision in wind turbine technology is to start with a propeller-based rotor because of its efficiency.   In part, this is due to the fact that a propeller blade has lift and will cause the rotor to turn faster than the actual wind velocity.  An impulse rotor, sometimes called a Savonius rotor, only turns at the speed of the wind, like an anemometer, and has somewhat lower efficiency that a propeller.

So using a propeller based rotor seems to be sound engineering at first glance.  The overall turbine efficiency is bounded by the aerodynamic solution.   However, when the efficiencies are multiplied together, the aerodynamic efficiency does not change the overall performance quite as much.  A side effect of the “obvious” focus on system efficiency is that the HWT solution has a number of technology issues that are becoming increasingly difficult to deal with.

Large horizontal wind turbines operate at wind speeds between 7 and 23 miles per hour, and depending on where they are sited, operate only 25% of the time on average.  In addition HWTs require steering systems, starting motors, hydraulic blade pitch controls and long transmission lines.

If HWT operating times could arbitrarily be doubled to 50%, the gain in productivity would far outweigh efficiency issues.  For this reason, the HWT industry is attempting to re-invent itself on the ocean.  Unfortunately, the Bard 1 Project off the German coast is proving to be more difficult to complete than previously anticipated.  Bard 1 has a project price tag over $3.5 billion dollars for 400MW of wind turbines, or $9.4 million per megawatt.  The cost of the offshore wind has more than doubled making any productivity gains negligible.

Conspicuously, there is never any commentary on how profitable wind power is.  If productivity cannot be increased, the only other option is to reduce the capital expense.  To date, the Federal and State governments have been underwriting more than 30% of the cost of wind power projects through tax write offs.

It should be obvious that production time and capital costs are more important to profitable wind power than the esoteric and costly technology that is being created to solve fundamental problems with HWTs.  Successful wind power will be a function of something that is inexpensive and can be sited in locations with constant prevailing winds.  Efficiency is secondary.

Not obvious.

About The Author

Steve Meyer

Tell Us What You Think! Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles Read More >

SUNY Adirondack to launch new program in mechatronics
Eplan Data Portal migrates to Azure
Transcript: How mechatronics is taking additive manufacturing to the next level
Is there a need for closed loop feedback greater than 20,000 CPR?

Robotics Year in Review

The Robot Report Listing Database

Latest Robotics News

Robot Report Podcast

Teradyne’s acquisition strategy & the future of cobot

The Robot Report Podcast · Teradyne's acquisition strategy & the future of cobots

Sponsored Content

  • Doosan Robotics: Driving Innovation and Growth in Cobots
  • FORT Robotics Podcast: FORT Robotics on how to keep humans safe and in control of robots
  • Pallet Detection Systems Help Automated Forklifts Modernize Warehouse Operations
  • IES Servo Control Gripper
  • How to cut the cost of manufacturing

Tweets by RoboticTips

The Robot Report
  • Collaborative Robotics Trends
  • Field Robotics Forum
  • Healthcare Robotics Engineering Forum
  • RoboBusiness Event
  • Robotics Business Review
  • Robotics Summit & Expo
  • About The Robot Report
  • Subscribe
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 WTWH Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media. Site Map | Privacy Policy | RSS

Search The Robot Report

  • Research
  • Technologies
    • Batteries / Power Supplies
    • Cameras / Imaging / Vision
    • Controllers
    • Grippers / End Effectors
    • Microprocessors / SoCs
    • Motion Control
    • Sensors / Sensing Systems
    • Soft Robotics
    • Software / Simulation
  • Development
    • A.I. / Cognition
    • Human Robot Interaction / Haptics
    • Mobility / Navigation
  • Robots
    • AGVs
    • AMRs
    • Consumer
    • Collaborative Robots
    • Drones
    • Exoskeletons
    • Self-Driving Vehicles
    • Unmanned Maritime Systems
  • Markets
    • Agriculture
    • Defense / Security
    • Healthcare
    • Logistics
    • Manufacturing
    • Mining
  • Investments
  • Resources
    • COVID-19
    • Digital Issues
    • Publications
      • Collaborative Robotics Trends
      • Robotics Business Review
    • RBR50
    • Search Robotics Database
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • RoboBusiness Direct
    • Robotics Summit & Expo
    • Healthcare Robotics Engineering Forum
    • DeviceTalks
    • R&D 100
  • Podcast