The Robot Report

  • Research
  • Technologies
    • Batteries / Power Supplies
    • Cameras / Imaging / Vision
    • Controllers
    • Grippers / End Effectors
    • Microprocessors / SoCs
    • Motion Control
    • Sensors / Sensing Systems
    • Soft Robotics
    • Software / Simulation
  • Development
    • A.I. / Cognition
    • Human Robot Interaction / Haptics
    • Mobility / Navigation
  • Robots
    • AGVs
    • AMRs
    • Consumer
    • Collaborative Robots
    • Drones
    • Exoskeletons
    • Self-Driving Vehicles
    • Unmanned Maritime Systems
  • Markets
    • Agriculture
    • Defense / Security
    • Healthcare
    • Logistics
    • Manufacturing
    • Mining
  • Investments
  • Resources
    • COVID-19
    • Digital Issues
    • Publications
      • Collaborative Robotics Trends
      • Robotics Business Review
    • RBR50
    • Search Robotics Database
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • RoboBusiness Direct
    • Robotics Summit & Expo
    • Healthcare Robotics Engineering Forum
    • DeviceTalks
    • R&D 100
  • Podcast

Motion Control, Hydraulics and PID

By Steve Meyer | December 29, 2013

In a recent and very erudite article, Peter Natchwey of Delta Computers sets forth an analysis of PID position control of hydraulic actuators.  Hydraulic actuators have their own complexities which we don’t need to consider, people have done text books on the subject. Hydraulic systems epitomize many aspects of mechatronics, pumping hydraulic fluid to create both pressure and flow, valve position to control flow, and in more complex systems, linear position of the hydraulic cylinder as part of the machine control.

Electrohydraulic systems have been around for many years, but recent advancements in electronics are bringing about changes to the field of hydraulics in much the same way microprocessors are transforming many fields.  Low cost computers are able to manage multi-axis motion control applications with relative ease.  The solution required in a hydraulic positioning application involves several additional loops to produce stable, accurate motion, but regardless of the mathematical complexity, today’s processor platforms are well able to handle the tasking.

The question at hand is how well does PID theory address positioning of a mechanical system.  Proportional-Integral-Derivative control, PID for short, is a poor choice for controlling position of mechanical systems.

Error detection of a load that is in position is no problem.  Nothing is moving and any disturbance is an easily detected value that can be corrected.  The major question in managing a stable position is what gain should be applied?  This becomes a complex problem to solve by itself, even before we consider the dynamics of the motion.  The biggest factor is the load mass.  Load mass predicts the time allowed for acceleration.  A large mass like a 1000 pound roll of printing paper can only be made to accelerate at a certain rate, and there is not much you can do to change the situation.  If load has a time constant, then the proportional gain required to stabilize the load while “in position” would have to be based on the time constant of the mass.  In a step and direction system, position can be maintained with no PID control.

Regulation of motion generally follows some simple rules.  When the load is moving at a constant speed, there is no acceleration or deceleration.  So velocity is a rate of position change.  Speed of the load can only be disturbed by changes that would show up as following error, the difference between commanded instantaneous position versus actual.  Again, the gain setting required for proper regulation would be related to the mass and the time allowed for system corrections.  In many systems, an allowable following error value is programmed in and no PID is required.

The simplified approach of looking at the individual states of motion within a given profile is not an end in itself, but a possibility to suggest that other rule bases could be derived and tested as alternatives to the traditional PID approach.  At the end of the day, regulation of a mechanical load can be simplified based on the state of the motion, stationary, constant speed, or accelerating and decelerating.  In my opinion, the best way to move the motion control industry forward is to begin re-writing the rules.

 

About The Author

Steve Meyer

Tell Us What You Think! Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles Read More >

SUNY Adirondack to launch new program in mechatronics
Eplan Data Portal migrates to Azure
Transcript: How mechatronics is taking additive manufacturing to the next level
Is there a need for closed loop feedback greater than 20,000 CPR?

Robotics Year in Review

The Robot Report Listing Database

Latest Robotics News

Robot Report Podcast

Teradyne’s acquisition strategy & the future of cobot

The Robot Report Podcast · Teradyne's acquisition strategy & the future of cobots

Sponsored Content

  • Doosan Robotics: Driving Innovation and Growth in Cobots
  • FORT Robotics Podcast: FORT Robotics on how to keep humans safe and in control of robots
  • Pallet Detection Systems Help Automated Forklifts Modernize Warehouse Operations
  • IES Servo Control Gripper
  • How to cut the cost of manufacturing

Tweets by RoboticTips

The Robot Report
  • Collaborative Robotics Trends
  • Field Robotics Forum
  • Healthcare Robotics Engineering Forum
  • RoboBusiness Event
  • Robotics Business Review
  • Robotics Summit & Expo
  • About The Robot Report
  • Subscribe
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 WTWH Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media. Site Map | Privacy Policy | RSS

Search The Robot Report

  • Research
  • Technologies
    • Batteries / Power Supplies
    • Cameras / Imaging / Vision
    • Controllers
    • Grippers / End Effectors
    • Microprocessors / SoCs
    • Motion Control
    • Sensors / Sensing Systems
    • Soft Robotics
    • Software / Simulation
  • Development
    • A.I. / Cognition
    • Human Robot Interaction / Haptics
    • Mobility / Navigation
  • Robots
    • AGVs
    • AMRs
    • Consumer
    • Collaborative Robots
    • Drones
    • Exoskeletons
    • Self-Driving Vehicles
    • Unmanned Maritime Systems
  • Markets
    • Agriculture
    • Defense / Security
    • Healthcare
    • Logistics
    • Manufacturing
    • Mining
  • Investments
  • Resources
    • COVID-19
    • Digital Issues
    • Publications
      • Collaborative Robotics Trends
      • Robotics Business Review
    • RBR50
    • Search Robotics Database
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • RoboBusiness Direct
    • Robotics Summit & Expo
    • Healthcare Robotics Engineering Forum
    • DeviceTalks
    • R&D 100
  • Podcast