The Robot Report

  • Home
  • News
  • Technologies
    • Batteries / Power Supplies
    • Cameras / Imaging / Vision
    • Controllers
    • End Effectors
    • Microprocessors / SoCs
    • Motion Control
    • Sensors
    • Soft Robotics
    • Software / Simulation
  • Development
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Human Robot Interaction / Haptics
    • Mobility / Navigation
    • Research
  • Robots
    • AGVs
    • AMRs
    • Consumer
    • Collaborative Robots
    • Drones
    • Humanoids
    • Industrial
    • Self-Driving Vehicles
    • Unmanned Maritime Systems
  • Business
    • Financial
      • Investments
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Earnings
    • Markets
      • Agriculture
      • Healthcare
      • Logistics
      • Manufacturing
      • Mining
      • Security
    • RBR50
      • RBR50 Winners 2025
      • RBR50 Winners 2024
      • RBR50 Winners 2023
      • RBR50 Winners 2022
      • RBR50 Winners 2021
  • Resources
    • Automated Warehouse Research Reports
    • Digital Issues
    • eBooks
    • Publications
      • Automated Warehouse
      • Collaborative Robotics Trends
    • Search Robotics Database
    • Videos
    • Webinars / Digital Events
  • Events
    • RoboBusiness
    • Robotics Summit & Expo
    • DeviceTalks
    • R&D 100
    • Robotics Weeks
  • Podcast
    • Episodes
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

How Safe Are Google’s Self-Driving Cars?

By Steve Crowe | May 12, 2015

Just how safe are Google‘s self-driving cars? Well, we’ll let you be the judge.

Google says its group of 20 autonomous cars have been involved in 11 accidents since hitting the roads in 2009. All the accidents, which were minor and did not cause injury, were caused by humans driving other cars.

Google says none of the accidents were caused by its self-driving cars.

Google’s self-driving cars have gone nearly 1 million miles autonomously in six years. Add in manual driving miles and Google’s self-driving cars have traveled about 1.7 million miles. So, how does that accident rate compare to us humans?

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the national rate for reported “property-damage-only crashes” is about 0.3 for every 100,000 miles. Google’s 11 accidents over 1.7 million miles comes out to 0.6 per 100,000 miles. However, according to Google, up to five million minor accidents each year aren’t reported.

Must-Read Back to the Future: Autonomous Driving in 1995

“Even when our software and sensors can detect a sticky situation and take action earlier and faster than an alert human driver, sometimes we won’t be able to overcome the realities of speed and distance; sometimes we’ll get hit just waiting for a light to change,” Chris Urmson, director of Google’s driverless cars program, writes. “And that’s important context for communities with self-driving cars on their streets; although we wish we could avoid all accidents, some will be unavoidable.”

Here’s a breakdown of the accidents:

  • 7 accidents involved Google cars being rear-ended
  • 2 were side-swipes
  • 1 accident involved a car rolling through a stop sign
  • 8 of the accidents occurred on city streets

Raj Rajkumar, a pioneer of autonomous driving technology with Carnegie Mellon University, tells The Guardian, however, that the priority for self-driving cars thus far has been to avoid major accidents, not fender benders.

Google released these details after The Associated Press reported that Google had notified California of three collisions involving its self-driving cars since September.

The NHTSA says 94% of accidents are caused by human errors, and most accidents occur at intersections. Urmson writes that Google has identified “patterns of driver behavior (lane-drifting, red-light running) that are leading indicators of significant collisions.”

“A self-driving car has people beat on this dimension of road safety,” Urmson writes. “With 360 degree visibility and 100% attention out in all directions at all times; our newest sensors can keep track of other vehicles, cyclists, and pedestrians out to a distance of nearly two football fields.”

Does this information change your opinion on self-driving cars? Take our survey below.

online surveys


About The Author

Steve Crowe

Steve Crowe is Executive Editor, Robotics, WTWH Media, and chair of the Robotics Summit & Expo and RoboBusiness. He is also co-host of The Robot Report Podcast, the top-rated podcast for the robotics industry. He joined WTWH Media in January 2018 after spending four-plus years as Managing Editor of Robotics Trends Media. He can be reached at [email protected]

Related Articles Read More >

a montage of motion control products from NIDEC.
Nidec returns to RoboBusiness to demo advanced robotics gears
ForSight Robotics.
ForSight Robotics raises $125M for cataract surgery tech
Parkhotel employees in Eisenstadt, Austria, celebrate the arrival of Pudu service robots.
Pudu Robotics CEO predicts that service robot market will expand
Meet the RBR50 Robotics Innovation Awards Winners

RBR50 Innovation Awards

“rr
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for Robotics Professionals.

Latest Episode of The Robot Report Podcast

Automated Warehouse Research Reports

Sponsored Content

  • Supporting the future of medical robotics with smarter motor solutions
  • YUAN Unveils Next-Gen AI Robotics Powered by NVIDIA for Land, Sea & Air
  • ASMPT chooses Renishaw for high-quality motion control
  • Revolutionizing Manufacturing with Smart Factories
  • How to Set Up a Planetary Gear Motion with SOLIDWORKS
The Robot Report
  • Automated Warehouse
  • RoboBusiness Event
  • Robotics Summit & Expo
  • About The Robot Report
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search The Robot Report

  • Home
  • News
  • Technologies
    • Batteries / Power Supplies
    • Cameras / Imaging / Vision
    • Controllers
    • End Effectors
    • Microprocessors / SoCs
    • Motion Control
    • Sensors
    • Soft Robotics
    • Software / Simulation
  • Development
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Human Robot Interaction / Haptics
    • Mobility / Navigation
    • Research
  • Robots
    • AGVs
    • AMRs
    • Consumer
    • Collaborative Robots
    • Drones
    • Humanoids
    • Industrial
    • Self-Driving Vehicles
    • Unmanned Maritime Systems
  • Business
    • Financial
      • Investments
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Earnings
    • Markets
      • Agriculture
      • Healthcare
      • Logistics
      • Manufacturing
      • Mining
      • Security
    • RBR50
      • RBR50 Winners 2025
      • RBR50 Winners 2024
      • RBR50 Winners 2023
      • RBR50 Winners 2022
      • RBR50 Winners 2021
  • Resources
    • Automated Warehouse Research Reports
    • Digital Issues
    • eBooks
    • Publications
      • Automated Warehouse
      • Collaborative Robotics Trends
    • Search Robotics Database
    • Videos
    • Webinars / Digital Events
  • Events
    • RoboBusiness
    • Robotics Summit & Expo
    • DeviceTalks
    • R&D 100
    • Robotics Weeks
  • Podcast
    • Episodes
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe